Is it too late for my loved one who has passed away?

Q. If God’s will is for us all to be in heaven and to have the full assurance of our salvation, why did He not tell me how to tell my loved one before she died how to have that? I could not tell her because I myself do not have that. The Bible says, “If it’s God’s will,” and if I know nothing else, I know that is His will. But it’s too late now because my loved one died and the Bible says a person must accept Jesus Christ as their Savior while ALIVE.

First, please accept my heartfelt condolences on the loss of your loved one. And I feel that I can add, in all sincerity, “may she rest in peace,” because as I explain in this post and in this post, as a biblical scholar, I believe there are some Scriptural grounds to believe that people may have some kind of opportunity to respond to God’s offer of salvation even after death. For example, Paul included “death” as one the things that cannot separate us from the love of God as he described those things in Romans. It’s hard for me to imagine God shutting the door of heaven to people anywhere who truly want to come in.

I recognize that people of genuine faith, who are equally committed to the authority and inspiration of the Scriptures, disagree about this matter. But I’d encourage you to think, precisely because there are these different understandings, that maybe things are not as hopeless for your loved one as they appear to you right now. And I hope that you will meet Jesus as your own Savior, Lord, and friend on this earth, and find assurance of salvation for yourself. I truly hope that there’s someone in your life who radiates the love of Christ. If you can recognize a person like that, please ask them to explain more about this to you. God bless you.

Is there a second chance for salvation after death?

Q. A loved one passed on recently who was not a Christian. A relative who was very close to him was desperately trying to find some information on how, maybe, there could be a chance that he would not go to hell. We stumbled onto this concept of Hades as an “interim destination” for the dead, distinct from hell as a final destination, where people might have a second chance. We’d like to know your thoughts on this.

On this blog I’ve expressed some thoughts very similar to those in the post you found, which I read and in which I found much to agree with. For example, in my post entitled, “Will there be anyone in hell who doesn’t want to be there?” I summarize my position this way: “I guess you could say I believe in some kind of opportunity to respond to God’s offer of salvation even after death.” I’d invite you to read that post and I hope it will offer you some further encouragement. As I also say there, “based on what I understand God to be like, I can’t imagine God leaving sincerely repentant people in hell [or Hades]—that is, people who wish they had repented, based on what they now realize.”

Will we see our pets again in heaven?

Q. Will I see my pet dog in heaven? I miss her every day. She has passed on due to a hit and run accident 4 years ago. At first when it happened, I was very upset with God. I couldn’t understand why he allowed this to happen. I entrusted my dog’s safety to him. But over the years, I saw how God used her death for good purposes and slowly, I heal. I kept wishing and hoping that I would see her again but I fear so much that it wouldn’t happen.

I haven’t found a specific, direct answer to your question in the Bible, but my personal belief is that yes, we will see our beloved pets again in heaven.

I base this answer not so much on a particular biblical teaching as on the overall biblical message, that God’s salvation is intended to renew the entire creation. It is not limited to the regeneration of human souls and the eventual resurrection of human bodies. God wants to restore the creation to its original harmony and beauty, and originally humans lived with animals peacefully and cooperatively.

So I don’t see why heaven wouldn’t bring back this arrangement, and I don’t see why individual animals who lived on earth wouldn’t get in on it, just as individual humans who lived on earth will. Certainly the biblical prophets’ visions of God’s renewed creation include animals, and they are living once again in harmony with one another and with humans. As Isaiah says, for example:

The wolf will live with the lamb,
    the leopard will lie down with the goat,
the calf and the lion and the yearling together;
    and a little child will lead them.

So while, as I said, I can’t cite a specific biblical passage that answers your question directly, I think you have every reason to hope confidently that you will see your friend again.

William Strutt, “Peace,” 1896

 

If our sins are forgiven, why will we “receive the things done in the body, good or bad”?

John Martin, The Last Judgment, 1852 (Tate Gallery, London)

Q.  “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.”  How do we reconcile this statement with receiving forgiveness for our sins? I know many of the forgiveness verses but struggle with reconciling them with verses like this one.

The difficulty you’re feeling is a classic example of what happens when the Bible is presented to us as a collection of “verses.” There are some biblical statements that simply can’t be reconciled with others if we take them to mean what they appear to say in isolation from their contexts.  But when we do consider them in context, we typically realize that they’re not quite saying those things, and that they can be reconciled.

I think the statement you’re asking about, which Paul makes in Second Corinthians, cannot refer to us being punished for our sins, because only a little bit afterwards, he asserts once again that “God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them.”  So then what does Paul mean by the statement you quote?

When we consider it in its context, we see that Paul is contrasting his own ministry with that of the rival teachers who had come to Corinth and who were trying to establish themselves by putting Paul down.  In the very next paragraph he says, “We are not commending ourselves to you again, but giving you cause to boast about us, so that you may be able to answer those who boast about outward appearance and not about what is in the heart.”

In other words, it will all be sorted out at “the judgment seat of Christ.”  Don’t listen to what those rival teachers are saying about me, Paul says; for that matter, don’t listen to what they’re saying about themselves.  Christ knows who the people are who are faithfully following him now, and he will acknowledge them before his heavenly throne.  And Christ also knows the people who are fakes, who are claiming to follow him but who are really only out for themselves, and he will expose them before his heavenly throne.

That isn’t our job here on earth.  We can take people at face value, at their word.  If they say they are sincerely following Christ, then we can work with them on that basis and trust that God will bring good fruit out of any ministry we have with them—so long as we pay careful attention to any “alarm bells” that warn us not to associate with a person who would be manipulative, exploitive, or abusive, to us or to others.  There is a certain discernment we are called to, but it stops short of guessing what’s in another person’s heart.

So the statement you’re asking about isn’t a threat or warning about punishment for our sins.  God no longer counts those against us, because we are reconciled to him in Christ.  Rather, it’s an encouragement to leave it to Christ to judge in the end the nature of anyone’s ministry, and to work in good faith with anyone who names the name of Christ and appears to be of honest and trustworthy character.  We can be confident that glory will ultimately go to that name, both now on earth as ministry is done, and later in heaven as everyone’s motives, good or bad, are shown for all to see.

Can people in hell be ‘saved’?

Q.  I have two items. The first relates to something you wrote on your blog. The second is related to your book, Paradigms on Pilgrimage. [That book is now available free online through the link provided. I will answer this reader’s second question in my next post.] 

Do you believe in proportional punishment in hell and an eventual ceasing-to-be? (Jesus said, “The servant who knows the master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what the master wants will be beaten with many blows, but the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows” and “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.)  Or do you believe people in hell can be “saved” if they repent enough?

I believe you’re asking this question in response to my recent post, “Will there be anyone in hell who doesn’t want to be there?”  In that post I say, in reply to a reader’s question about my own personal views, “I guess you could say I believe in some kind of opportunity to respond to God’s offer of salvation even after death.”

I’m grateful to have the opportunity here to clarify that such a response, if one were indeed possible, would not require a person to “repent enough” or in any other way do penance or make satisfaction for their earthly sins.  In other words, I don’t subscribe to the idea of some sort of purgatory in which a soul “does its time” and in that way is made fit for heaven, in a way that it wasn’t at the time of death.

Rather, I believe that if a person did still have the opportunity to respond to God’s offer of salvation after death, this offer would be extended in the same way as to us on earth:  completely on the basis of grace, on the merits of Christ’s death for us on the cross.  I’m hopeful that something might bring a person, even after death, to realize that in life they should have embraced this gracious offer from a loving God, and that they want to do so now.

I don’t believe we have a clear teaching in the Bible about many of the specific details of the afterlife.  Rather, this is a view that I hold in light of the character of God, as that is revealed quite clearly to us in the Bible.  As I say at the end of the series that prompted the reader’s question about my own views:

“The Bible doesn’t tell us nearly as much as we would like about the fate of people after death.  But it does tell us a great deal about the character of God, in which justice and mercy are perfectly balanced. . . . Maybe the thing to do is to allow our understanding of the character of God to inform our view of what happens after death.”

And as I say in the more recent post about my own views, “Based on what I understand God to be like, I can’t imagine God leaving sincerely repentant people in hell—that is, people who wish they had repented, based on what they now realize.”

To state this in terms of your question, I think this means that I do believe that people in hell (that is, people who, after death, have not entered into the presence of God based on their grateful acceptance in life of what Christ did for them) can still be saved, but not on the basis of anything they do except embracing God’s gift now.

As for an eventual ceasing-to-be of those who resolutely and permanently hold out against God’s gracious offer, I think that’s implied in what I say in that same post: “God’s ultimate design is to bring all things back under his rule and authority. . . .  Then hell will not exist for all eternity, since it is a place where, by definition, God’s authority is denied and resisted.”

Finally, as for the idea of proportional punishments, I believe that the parable you cite from Luke, about the knowingly disobedient receiving more blows than the unknowingly disobedient, is not actually talking about proportional punishments for those who are not saved, but rather proportional rewards and punishments for those who are saved.

This is one of those master-and-servants parables that Jesus told to teach his own disciples about how they should relate to him.  It is clearly “eschatological,” that is, concerned with Jesus’ Second Coming.  And it teaches, like similar parables, that our faithful service to God on earth will help determine the responsibilities and opportunities we are given in the kingdom of God once it has fully come.  In this particular parable, we discover that there are not only rewards for faithful servants but punishments for unfaithful ones–some form of chastisement.

But even this must be seen as the expression of God’s love for us.  The author of Hebrews, quoting Proverbs, encourages us, “Don’t make light of the Lord’s discipline, and don’t give up when he corrects you. For the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes each one he accepts as his child.”  And Jesus himself says in his letter to Laodicea in the book of Revelation, “Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline.”

Still, this ought to put the “fear of God” in us, quite literally, and help us to be more diligent in doing God’s will as we know it!  But I think it is taking this part of Jesus’ parable about servants and their master quite out of context to hold that it teaches there will be proportionate punishments for those who have not been God’s servants.

A contemporary depiction of the exhortation in Jesus’ parable, “Be dressed for service and keep your lamps burning, as though you were waiting for your master to return from the wedding feast. Then you will be ready to open the door and let him in the moment he arrives and knocks.”

Will there be anyone in hell who doesn’t want to be there?

Q. I read your series of posts on “Is hell a place of never-ending punishment?” with great interest. Which view do you personally favor?

When it comes to my own personal reflections on this issue, I actually start with a different question, not “Does hell last forever?” but “Will there be anyone in hell who doesn’t want to be there?”  I say at the end of my last post in the series you mention, “Maybe the thing to do is to allow our understanding of the character of God to inform our view of what happens after death, rather than letting possible interpretations of the afterlife make us question what we would otherwise believe about what God is like.”  And based on what I understand God to be like, I can’t imagine God leaving sincerely repentant people in hell—that is, people who wish they had repented, based on what they now realize.  (I recognize this view might be controversial, something that many people may not have heard before, but this is the view I favor.)

So I guess you could say I believe in some kind of opportunity to respond to God’s offer of salvation even after death.  Paul did include “death” as among the things that cannot separate us from the love of God in his list in Romans.  It’s hard for me to imagine God shutting the door of heaven to people anywhere who genuinely want to come in.

On the other hand, there actually are people who will want to be in hell.  They will take the same attitude as Satan in Milton’s Paradise Lost, “Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven.”  To give another example, in James Joyce’s novel A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, the main character, Stephen Dedalus, after explaining that he has “lost the faith,” continues:

“I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland, or my church: and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defense the only arms I allow myself to use — silence, exile, and cunning. . . . I am not afraid to make a mistake, even a great mistake, a lifelong mistake, and perhaps as long as eternity too.”

William Ernest Henley wrote similarly at the end of his poem Invictus:

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

So there are some people who will chose self-determination above God’s gracious offer of salvation, because they want to run their own lives, no matter where that leads. (These are all examples from literature, but they capture an attitude that can be found in life as well.)

So hell is a place where people do not acknowledge the sovereignty and authority of God.  My next question is, “Would God allow such a place to exist for all eternity?”  I don’t think so.  I think we see from the Bible that the end matches the beginning.  In the original creation, everything was harmonious and under God’s rule.  God allowed the rebellion of sin for reasons we don’t fully understand, but I believe God gave only conditional and temporary permission for this rebellion to occur.  God’s ultimate design is to bring all things back under his rule and authority.  (Paul wrote at the beginning of Ephesians, for example, “With all wisdom and understanding, God made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times reach their fulfillment—to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth under Christ.”  Paul also wrote in 1 Corinthians, “For Christ must reign until God has put all his enemies under his feet”—no lingering rebellion.)  If that’s the case, then hell will not exist for all eternity, since it is a place where, by definition, God’s authority is denied and resisted.

Well, that’s the view I favor, anyway, though I respect the opposite view as well.  Both views can appeal to much in the Scriptures for support.  I don’t think we can dot every I and cross every T when it comes to filling out all the details of our understanding of the afterlife.  But that’s how I think about these things personally, anyway.